10.13.2008

Preying Prayers

I don't use this word lightly. This pastor really was stupid. But he's not someone to make fun of, because the hate-mongering he used to prep the crowd for McCain is terrifying indeed.

Earlier today, before McCain arrived at the rally, a pastor gave an opening prayer, astounding in it's mixture of religion and politics, lack of basic understanding of other faiths, lack of basic understanding of Christian theology, and level of hate.

The pastor, Arnold Conrad, "prayed":

There are millions of people around this world praying to their god — whether it’s Hindu, Buddha, Allah — that his [McCain’s] opponent wins, for a variety of reasons
Well, actually, Hindu is a person who follows Hinduism. It's not the name of a god. Buddha is not a god, except in folk Buddhism practices where he's elevated to that level. Allah is the Arabic word for "God". Arab Christians use this word when they pray. You know, something like our use of the word "god" which we took from the head of the Germanic pagan pantheon so we'd have a word in English.

Don't get me wrong. I believe there is a place for saying, "My god is different from your god." If I'm looking to nuances in theology, I can say at some point that my God as a Quaker is different from the God of a Baptist. He's still the same God, of course, but because we perceive him in different ways, in very nuanced different ways, he is different. While acknowledging this difference, I in no way question the salvation of the other, and I affirm that our two Gods are, in truth, the same entity. But a Christian who focuses more on the wrath of God will have a slightly different God than I do, for we all create God in our own image.

As to "they" praying that Obama wins- well, there are some good reasons they are praying that Obama wins. Part of that would be that they don't want to be bombed anymore. There's also good reasons that they are praying to different gods than the Muslim-Judeo-Christian God- namely, because they don't believe in that god, so it would be difficult for them to knowingly pray to him.

And what if the non-Christians do pray for "the other guy"? Since when did that mean God wouldn't listen to them? If they are more in line with the values of the Kingdom than the so-called followers of Jesus, why wouldn't Jesus listen to their prayers instead? Or do we have a God so foolish that he says, "I know you guys aren't praying for what I want to happen. But since you claim my name, I'm going to subvert my entire process and the future of the planet, just because you signed up on a dotted line."? God hears all prayers. He cares about the Kingdom, and not just the Church. And he offers the Grace to extend a listening ear and answering hand, even while we were yet sinners.

Then Pastor Congrad goes on to pray:

And Lord, I pray that you would guard your own reputation because they’re going to think that their god is bigger than you if that happens. So I pray that you will step forward and honor your own name in all that happens between now and Election Day.
Talk about your shock and awe. Now this pastor is trying to create a dichotomy between peoples. He's a divider, not a uniter. That's not the Spirit of Jesus Christ. He's preying on the fears of The Other that have risen in America since 9/11. If the rest of the world likes Obama, well, he must be bad, just as John McCain said. This will certainly not enhance America's reputation in the world.

I'm not a big fan of pretending to pray when you're actually preaching. Contrary to his written comments to CNN, this was in no way a heart-felt prayer. This was preaching (to the converted). This was pretending that you're having a conversation with the Almighty, when really you're trying to sway other humans in the room. It is an insult to God to do this, to pretend, to act in one way. It is hypocrisy. Which makes me wonder, where were the people listening to this prayer and willing to stand up and yell out, "Blasphemy!"? The Age of Martyrs it appears is long past. We no longer have Christians in the U.S. willing to stand up for Christ and speak Truth.

For what kind of God is it that needs us to defend his honor? Rest assured, his reputation will in no way be besmiched if Obama wins, or even if McCain wins. God's reputation will be intact. Pastor Conrad's God seems to be the one of Star Trek V: Search for God. It is arguably the worst Star Trek movie ever made, but it has its moments. Principle among these is the end, wherein they find God, and he is happy, for he can use their starship to finally return to his children throughout the galaxy. In one of the most memorable lines ever uttered in Trek lore, Captain Kirk says, "Excuse me. Excuse me. I have a question. What does God need with a starship? Really. I want to know. What does God need with a starship?"

The answer, of course, is that God, if he truly is God, doesn't need a starship in the slightest. His plans will go forward, with or without us. The theologically correct answer is that he allows us to participate in his plans, for he knows we will experience greater delight by doing so, and that is what we were created for- to experience Joy in him.

Pastor Conrad, God's reputation won't be hurt by who wins the Presidency. Do you know what will hurt God's reputation? Prayers like this. And only because people will get confused, thinking that God and his followers happen to be on the same page. Pastor Conrad, I think you may be right. My God is not the same as your god.

5 comments:

Hindu Atheist said...

Crazy world. Its between Hanuman, Indian God Versus Jesus now...

http://hinduatheist.blogspot.com/2008/10/hindu-monkey-god-hanuman-for-obama.html

Anonymous said...

I think both can't make different policy, because basically isreal work in usa and handle american think tanks.

Jed Carosaari said...

That is certainly a grave hurdle, Sana. But insha'allah, I believe we have a better chance for justice with Barack, considering his background and experiences. Remember, Clinton was far from perfect, but he was much, much better at pursuing peace in Palestine than George II. And I believe Obama will be better than Clinton. He has the baraka, after all. But he can't talk about it right now, because the extreme right (Republicans) have spent the last year accusing him of being an "evil" Muslim Arab. He has to win first.

Jon Trott said...

There are two things that, as an very whole-hearted Obama supporter, I find painful in his rhetoric.

1. Support of Israel (which I also support), yet voiced in a completely non-critical way. This is due the election itself, which in America rarely allows for any nuance. Yet I would remind Barack that "Faithful are the wounds of a friend." That is, if Israel really is our number one ally in the Middle East, then we need to let our best friend know when he/she has done wrong. That's where nuance comes in, esp. as applied to Palestine.

2. The sacralization of nation-states with religious language. This is a sociological given to happen in almost all nations, but America, Israel, and some Muslim nations lead in the perfection of this nationalistic idolatry. Justifying power via the Deity (whether Jesus, Allah, or Jehovah) is Evil... capital "E". God judges the nations, all of which fall short because they are in fact collections of fallen human beings, and because they exist and maintain themselves via a mixture of military and economic manipulations. No U. S. Presidential Candidate could ever disavow this unholy mix of God and Nation, including Barack Obama. So I don't blame him. But I don't like it, any more than I like hearing it done by supporters of Israel or (as an example) Iran. It does prove one thing, though... God's Patience for our ignorance and willful sin -- collectively here -- is beyond comprehension. Guess that's why the New Testament calls it "Grace" -- unmerited favor.

Jed Carosaari said...

Completely agree, Jon. But I am believing, I am hoping, that Obama's rhetoric is just that- in order to get elected, and once elected, he will come to something a bit closer to Pres. Carter's beliefs on Israel.