10.30.2008

McCain: Off the Rails

In an amazing rally today, the McCain campaign showed that it was running off the rails completely. At one point he began to tell his audience something, and then decided, "Never mind." At a pivotal moment, he called for Michael - I mean "Joe the Plumber", to come on stage, and then learned that Joe wasn't actually at the rally. And then, in the middle of his speech, he said something that sounds a bit like, "abrgjik". I kid you not. Listen to the speech. I replayed it a few times, because it sounded so very odd. It sounded like suddenly, he was speaking the language of an outer space alien. Which frankly, raises far too many truly frightening scenarios for me to contemplate.

And yet, for all of these rhetorical errors, that was not the most glaring nor revolting mistake of the speech. In McCain's bid to try to make American tax law, McCain's past policies, and Obama all sound socialist, McCain is now bringing up an old radio interview of Obama's, where Obama also used the R-word- redistribution. But here's where McCain has entered truly dangerous waters.

In this interview, Obama very clearly is speaking of the legacy of slavery. He speaks of how the civil rights movement lead to freedom for blacks, and the right to vote, but didn't redistribute income- and this still remains to be done. He speaks of mistakes the founding fathers made- as everyone acknowledges who has any understanding of the ammendment process in the US constitution. This is of course particularly true with ammendments like the 14th.

I recognize that some conservatives feel that everything is now right with the world, between races, and in regards to civil rights. I suspect- I hope- that those conservatives are a minority even among conservatives. Most recognize that one of the horrible legacies of slavery has been lingering racism and a continued relegation of the majority of blacks to the lower economic classes. Beyond that, there is the slightly more controversial proposal of compensation for slavery. After all, not only was there the broken promise of "40 acers and a mule", but all the wealth in terms of human productivity that was stolen from African lands, and stolen from the Africans themselves, made into slaves. To date there has been no true payment to those defrauded by the American government and American people. But the proposal is not so controversial that is has not been considered by the American Congress at times.

Some combination of these issues is what Obama was obviously referring to in his radio interview. From the context, I suspect that it was more of the former- establishing economic parity between the races in America, to remove the blemish and stain of slavery that shackles us all- rather than the more touchy issue of compensation. He was trying to seek a more just society, and make up for the wrongs that America has perpetrated on her citizens of colour.

And this...this is what McCain was referring to today in his speech, when he said that Obama was being socialist.

Before McCain denigrates calls for racial equality, it might be helpful for him to remember the immortal words of Frederick Douglass.
No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck.

2 comments:

Timothy McMahan King said...

Jedidiah, Tim from Gods politics.

Thanks for your post. I appreciate its thoughtfullness which is not allways characteristic of those posting on the blog.

To clarify my statement on the Essenes. With mores space I would have clarified that I was not referring to the essenes as typified by the Qumran community but by John the Baptists probable connection to them.

Some biblical scholars have noted that there is probably some significance to the fact that John baptized on the East side of the jordan (away from Israel) and not the west side (in Israel.)

There was certainly conflict between Jesus' Disciples and John as well as confustion between John and Jesus as to Jesus' identity.

My interpretation would be that John was a prophet who sought seperation and Jesus had a much higher level of engagement.

Any further thoughts you can reach me at tking at sojo dot net

Jed Carosaari said...

Thanks for clarifying. I agree, John has a lot in common with the Essenes, and makes a better comparison for the approach of those Christians desiring to separate themselves from the government yet still continue to be prophetic. In the same way, John was much more in line with the Old Testament prophets.

But I think we have to be wary of expecting that someone has to follow Jesus' example exactly. The prophets, including John, can be great examples too. We're not all supposed to be carpenters, after all. And one could say that Jesus statement of Caesar vs. God, as well as how he had no inclination to work within the Sanhedrian, indicates that Jesus was for working from outside the governing system, and yet having a stronger prophetic role than John the Baptist. In the same way, this Christian who feels we shouldn't vote would speak out against injustice, in and out of the government, yet not be part of the U.S. government.